March 2012 Archives
This question arrived as a follow-up question to a recent post...
I am new to the business and an independent broker. In automobile parts (I deal with travel trailers, RV's, automotive and such) does MFI make a difference? Recycled or virgin? We are trying to cut costs, and it seems a lower MFI and recycled product is cheaper.
MFI is essentially a measurement of how much of a particular material flows through a capillary under a given load during the course of 10 minutes. The stresses and shear rates present in this test are not indicative of most plastics processes. If you want more comparative data you can acquire rheological data from the manufacturers... or request samples and actually preform some comparative rheological tests using your actual production equipment.
You always need to first determine whether the use of regrind poses a liability issue with your customers. You should determine the relative quality of the regrind. Depending on the application, you can choose from a wide range of Rheological, physical property, and performance testing methods.
Some related posts on rheology and physical properties:
I am often asked whether or not it is important to provide employees with printed certificates once they complete their training. As a result, I want to use this post to discuss the importance of creating a training portfolio for your employees.
Building a Training Portfolio
Every time your employees complete a step in their training plan or make an advance in competency, it should be documented and retained by the employee. We suggest that you create a personalized binder that the employee can use to store items such as training certificates, worksheets, training aides, photographs, and documents. The intent is to create a personal portfolio which the employee can use to demonstrate not only what they learned, but what they have applied.
For all those attending NPE 2012, please visit us at Booth #472 in the West Hall.
Stop by to discuss training, technology, plastics, or anything else you wish to review.
At our booth, you can also pick up your free copy of our new pocket guide entitled:
'The Injection Molding Reference Guide'
I also recommend you take advantage of our free passes (a $120 value): http://www.npe2012guest.org/?e=314
I received this question last week...
I am trying to find out why the injection pressure of PP is lower than the injection pressure of PC in terms of its MFI. But the MFI for PC is at a different temperature and for PP is at a different temperature.
Essentially, Melt Flow Index (MFI) is not an objective test. MFI uses different specifications for testing different materials. The pressures and shear rates are different than those encountered in production, and the temperatures are typically not the same either.
The benefit to this test is that it is easy for anyone to conduct, and it provides a single number result.
The most effective use of the MFI test, I have encountered, is to compare different batches of the same material grade for material scheduling.
Objective testing such as capillary rheometry or spiral flow are much more involved, but can provide much more comprehensive results.
I discuss this in more detail in these posts:
There are many rules to good processing, but this one is paramount...
What is the most important thing to look for when evaluating a technicians ability to process?
The most important factor in good processing is 'Rule #1 - Make One Process Change at a Time'. When a change is made, it’s imperative to wait for the results to take place before making another process adjustment. This rule ensures you know the specific cause and effect of any change made to the injection molding process.
For example, if you increase both the injection speed and packing pressure at the same time, you may eliminate a short shot, but while doing so - you’ve created flash, part sticking, burning, and cracking. Because you changed two parameters at the same time, you don’t know which change corrected the short shot and which parameter resulted in causing each of the new defects.
Anyone changing more than one parameter at a time is not approaching the process systematically.
Recently a technicians asked me this question...
During a gate seal determination (part weight vs. second stage time), we saw the part weight almost stabilize and then it shot up until it finally leveled out. What might have caused this?
When doing a gate seal determination, you might see this two-plateau result. Essentially, this is causes by material shrinkage in the gate area allowing more material to flow through the gate before the gate finally freezes.
The material can either flow through the center of the gate as the material shrinks around itself, or the material can flow around the gate as it shrinks away from the mold surface.This is most common when you are molding parts with thick gates or materials with especially high melt flow rates.
Since the first plateau is caused by stagnation of flow before a second flow of material into the mold cavity, it is always good to verify that such a process does not result in delamination, brittleness, or low mechanical strength.
This question arrived as a follow-up to a previous post: More About Back Pressure...
If I have to work with an odd back pressure like 250 bar, does it create any damage to the equipment or machine?
Assuming this is the plastic pressure, this would not necessarily cause machine damage. This will consume a large amount of energy and create a large amount of shear during recovery. The potential for material and additive degradation may be high depending on the material being processed.
You may wish to consider a new screw designed specifically to address the complication you are encountering during recovery. For instance you may need a longer transition zone if the shear is necessary for melting, or you may need a mixing element in the metering zone if the back pressure is used for additive mixing.
This may be great application for a shot-pot style of molding machine. This would allow a properly designed material-specific screw to be used to melt and convey the material while a plunger is used to inject the melted polymer.
This question was received earlier this week...
What should be the minimum pressure during switch over time of injection?
If you are switching over through the use of screw position, then you should ensure the maximum pressure setting is significantly higher than injection pressure at transfer.
It is critical that you have enough pressure available to maintain the desired injection speed.
More about this can be found here:
I received this question via email yesterday...
Which is the best type of training?
No single method of training can meet each of the success factors necessary to teach all your employees. For this reason, it is important to use a training plan comprised of multiple training methods targeted to teach your employees the knowledge and skills they need to succeed.
Our approach to employee training most often includes factors such as focused on-the-job instruction, interactive online training, and skill development exercises.